Home > Uncategorized > Top Person of the Week – Ian Hunter [Labor MLC – SA]

Top Person of the Week – Ian Hunter [Labor MLC – SA]

image The Top Person of the Week goes to Ian Hunter, the South Australian Labor MLC who on Wednesday 17 June 2009 spoke in the South Australian Legislative Council in relation to Same-Sex Marriage Rights. 

Ian Hunter delivered a passionate and personal speech which took aim at the usual reasons trotted out against marriage equality.  But more importantly, he took aim at Kevin Rudd (Australian Prime Minister) at his personal and government stance on marriage equality.

For that reason Ian Hunter wins the Top Person of the Week award.

His speech is reproduced below.

Matter of Interest Speech – Wednesday 17 June 2009

I K Hunter

Marriage Rights

I rise today to speak about a matter close to my heart. I want to get married.

But I can’t – I can’t marry the person I love; not in my own country at least.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says he and his government believe that marriage should be maintained as the union between a man and a woman. If that’s his opinion – fair enough. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But to impose his personal beliefs on the rest of the community is just wrong.

Going on from that, the Prime Minister has added that the government might look at partnership registrations some time in the future.

Well, I might have accepted that – 20 years ago. But times and the issue has moved on. Registration is no longer good enough.

I no longer think that it is adequate that I might one day be able to go to the local council and register my partnership as I might register my dog. I want to get married.

Around the world, the fight for marriage equality has been going on – and around the world, states, courts, community and parliaments have been rising to the fight. They are deciding that homosexual and heterosexual couples can choose to marry, and can be treated exactly the same way.
The Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden and Spain have all legalised same-sex marriage, as have the US states of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine and Vermont. It looks like New York is pretty close, too, and of course there is the on-going debate in California.

Add to that the list of countries where civil unions are recognized – from the United Kingdom to Luxembourg, and many in between – and you start to realise how completely out-of-step Australia is beginning to look with those nations that we like to compare ourselves with. What a sad state of affairs when the nation that pats itself on the back for being the country of a ‘fair go for all’ denies its citizens this very basic right.

Now, it might be that I am out of step with many of you here in this Chamber – and I might even be out of step with some in my party – and I’m certainly out of step with Prime Minister Rudd on this issue – but I stand here today to let him and everyone else know that second best is no longer an option.

I am no longer content to accept the crumbs from the table.

I am no longer willing to accept a reinforced second-class status.

I am longer prepared to accept a proposition that my married friends’ relationships are intrinsically superior to my relationship.

And I certainly won’t accept the proposal that means my relationship is registered at the local council or some similar body.

Because partnership registration is about death – and what happens to your estate on your death. Marriage is about life – how you live your life publicly in a loving relationship with a partner and with our families.

I want to get married. Next year will be the twentieth anniversary of my not-being-married to my partner, Leith. Yes, I could travel to Massachusetts or South Africa and get married there. But that is not my preferred option: I want to share my marriage with my family and my friends – like we all do.

No-one has ever been able to provide me with an adequate response as to why marriage should be confined to a man and a woman. The response that this form of ‘traditional marriage’ should be retained because of the biblical tradition doesn’t hold much water for all of us who have no interest in getting married in a church – and last year, that was more than 60 per cent of all couples who exchanged vows.

The ability to bear and raise children is another reason often given for standing against gay marriage. You know what? I know plenty of gay parents who are wonderful parents; and I know plenty of straight couples who don’t have children, either through choice or circumstance. So that doesn’t hold up either as an argument.

As for the sanctity of marriage being threatened by gay marriage – all I can say to that is: if your heterosexual marriage is going to be somehow devalued by your homosexual neighbours marriage, that says more about your relationship than it does about mine.

The marriage equality debate is gathering speed around the world and yet Australia finds itself once again a backwater in this debate. It is time for the community’s voice to be raised, calling for marriage equality and I add my voice to that call today.

Because I want to get married – and you, Mr Rudd, are stopping me.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: